ReviewReadyClean File QA Send one file for a free QA review
For roofing & restoration supplement writers and estimators

Catch missing photos, labels, and support before the packet leaves your office.

Send us an estimate packet, photo set, and supporting docs. We check whether a reviewer can follow the file — which line items have support, which photos need labels, and where the packet is missing basic documentation.

Documentation QA only. Not claims advice. Not coverage, pricing, negotiation, or public adjusting. Human-checked before you receive it.

The real cost isn't the estimate

A lot of the avoidable friction is documentation, not pricing.

Many packets don't get delayed because the work is wrong — they get delayed because a remote reviewer can't follow the file. That delay is rework on your end.

Photos are hard to organize and tie back to the estimate in a clean way a desk reviewer can follow.

Common documentation gap · roofing & restoration

It's not just photos — missing O&P notes, thin functional-damage explanations, and drying logs that don't match the line items create rework too.

Common documentation gap · water mitigation
The product is the report

The same packet, two ways.

Every finding is tied to a specific line item, photo, or log — with why a reviewer would follow up and the documentation fix. Flip the toggle to see the same packet after the fixes are made.

Proof of process

Behind the QA report: how we map evidence.

This is our internal review workspace. For each estimate line item, we attach the available support — photos, measurements, logs, or documents — and mark whether it's supported, partial, or missing. The customer-facing output is the QA report and punch list, not another field app your team has to learn.

  • Evidence library — photos, measurements, logs, supporting docs
  • Line-item review — supported / partial / unsupported
  • Packet checks — missing labels, narratives, logs, or measurement basis
For the free review you don't use this workspace. Send one redacted packet — we run this internally and return the QA report. We work from what you already have:
Xactimate exportPDF estimatePhoto ZIPEagleViewDrying logs
View sample workspace →
ReviewReady internal review workspace — evidence library and line-item review

Our internal review workspace. You don't operate this for the free review.

The checklist

Four categories a reviewer cares about.

The same structure every report follows — tuned for roofing, restoration, and mixed packets.

01

Photo Evidence

  • Photos labeled by slope, room, or component
  • An overview paired with each close-up
  • Directional labels present (front/rear, N/S/E/W)
  • Photos tied to the line items they support
02

Estimate Support

  • Major line items have a supporting photo or doc
  • No lump sums or unclear breakdowns
  • Measurement basis documented and reconciled
03

Narrative Support

  • Functional-damage explanation present
  • Replace-vs-repair reasoning documented
  • If O&P is on the estimate, a written basis note is in the file (we check the note is present — we don't decide whether O&P is owed)
04

Mitigation / Restoration

  • Drying logs complete and present
  • Equipment line items matched to the logs
  • Equipment placement diagram included
From export to reviewer-ready

Three steps. No software to install.

ReviewReady works from what you already produce. Send the files, get findings, fix the gaps before the packet leaves.

Step 01

Send the file

Estimate export, photo set, measurements, drying logs, and supporting docs. A closed or redacted sample is enough for the free review.

Xactimate XLSXPDF reportPhotos / ZIPEagleViewDrying logs
Step 02

We run the QA checklist

We map the major line items to the available support and flag missing context, unlabeled photos, lump-sum items, and mismatched docs — with provenance you can trace.

Evidence mappingCompleteness rulesLabel suggestions
Step 03

You get a punch list

A documentation-only QA report with prioritized, fixable gaps before the packet goes out — plus a documentation-readiness score.

Readiness scorePDF / HTML reportField reshoot list
Why bother

Touch the file once, not three times.

Fix it once

Catch the missing photo and the lump-sum line before submission instead of after. You handle the packet one time, not reopened weeks later.

Less avoidable back-and-forth

A complete, internally consistent packet gives a reviewer fewer documentation reasons to come back for more. Less re-review churn on your end.

A second set of eyes that's awake

The unlabeled photo and the catch-all line are easy to miss at 11pm. We're the check that catches them before the packet goes out the door.

A deliberately narrow tool

Documentation QA — not claim strategy.

ReviewReady stays on the safe side of the line. It reduces avoidable review friction without crossing into public adjusting, coverage advice, or estimate authoring.

What it does
  • Flags line items with no linked photo or document
  • Suggests photo labels and flags where a note is missing
  • Flags line items that aren't clearly tied to photos or docs
  • Scores documentation readiness with traceable reasons
What it never does
  • Tell you what's covered or what you're owed
  • Write or negotiate claims on your behalf
  • Author estimates or log into licensed platforms
  • Communicate with carriers directly
Where we stop. ReviewReady checks documentation completeness and internal consistency only. We do not determine coverage, claim value, scope entitlement, pricing, negotiation strategy, or what should be paid. We are not public adjusters. Every review is human-checked. What you submit, and how you use the QA report, is your call.
Straight answers

The questions everyone asks first.

Free file review

Send us one closed packet. We'll show you what we'd flag.

Pick a job you've already settled — so nothing's on the line — strip the homeowner's name and address, and send the estimate and photos. We'll run the full QA and send back the punch list of documentation gaps we found.

  • Free. No call required, no card.
  • Redacted files only — no name, address, or claim number needed.
  • We delete the file after review. Never shared with carriers, never used to train AI models.
  • Worst case: you've spent one upload and learned where your packets are thin.

Redacted files only — no homeowner name, address, or claim number needed. We delete the file after review. Never shared with carriers, never used to train AI models — we may use anonymized patterns to improve the checklist.

Got it. We'll review your packet and send the punch list back within two business days. Check your email for an upload link if you didn't attach the file here.